Comments on: Does A 2003 Video Change Your Opinion Of The ‘Too Hot For Citibank’ Story?

By: Dean Arrindell

Dean Arrindell — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:25:26 +0000

Beth – I doubt it, too. And I’m sure her Playboy (or Maxim, etc.) photo spread will hit news stands and web browsers by the end of the year.

By: Lori Napoli

Lori Napoli — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:01:57 +0000

The thing that has struck me the entire time with this story is that it runs counter to everything we have heard and been told for so many years–aren’t life and professional careers supposedly MORE successful and easier for the beautiful?

By: Mike Ottone

Mike Ottone — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:41:53 +0000

HA! Ok, first of all, she says “sex on a stick” — which is, well, stereotypical of the mid-20′s single life. Both women and men, expecially in NYC, hit the scene for physical relationships. She is a single mom already, looks like she was around 21-22 when her son was born. So, she has not grownup yet. This is unfortunate for him. I think she is working the publicity and she will end up in a magazine. Her apparent goal.
But, suing Citibank? I am sure they have all the support needed to fire her, because they would not risk opening themselves up for a lawsuit. Major corporations are prepared for this stuff all the time. My two cents.

By: Beth

Beth — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:24:48 +0000

Who will ever know if she’s telling the truth or not. It’s been so warped by her, her lawyers, Citibank, and the media that we may never know.

My issue is that she’s handling it unprofessionally *now.* Every interview she goes on (i.e. on MSNBC the other day, she said “I wore to work what I’m wearing today [a knee-length dress] except at work I wore a jacket”. So… why aren’t you wearing a jacket for your interviews? I know for a fact that the studio you’re sitting in isn’t too warm for it.)

If she were serious, she’d stop taking sexy photos, stop risking her current job by speaking to the media about her old job, and yea, drop the frivolous lawsuit. She has another job, she’s an attractive woman, she’s media-savvy – many MANY people have NONE of these attributes in this economy, so she needs to move on with her otherwise successful life, as does the media.

Leads me to one conclusion: At this point, she’s simply angling to garnish more publicity for herself, loves seeing herself made up and on TV/in magazines, and has trampled over any sort of real case she may have once had (if she ever really had one) in order to see her mug on TV more often.

My question: Would someone claiming to be fired for being unattractive get this much media attention? I doubt it…

My prediction: You’ll see her as a Playboy centerfold shortly.